As you will recall, the Executive Board (EB) of INCITS, the US voting body on OOXML in the ISO/IEC JTC1, posted two simultaneous, seven day written ballots - one to approve, with comments, and one to abstain, again with comments. The votes have now been received back. and are as follows:
- Abstain, with comments: Unanimous
- Approve, with comments: 12 for, 3 against, 1 abstaining (six with appended comments). The full results of this vote are here.
While the votes to approve are sufficient and that may well be the final result, the game is not necessarily over yet, as members will be free to change their votes at the August 29 if they so desire. The EB members that switched their votes in this ballot were NIST, the Department of Defense, and GS1 (Lexmark had switched from "No" to "yes" in a straw vote held at the last in-person resolution meeting).
The government decided to vote together, and to follow NIST (Homeland Security had voted in favor of approval in the previous ballot), so DoD fell in line as well. NIST, you may recall, is an agency of the Department of Commerce (as I reported Steve Ballmer personally called the Secretary of the DOC to urge this result). GS1is a technical association.
Meanwhile, the votes around the world are beginning to come in, some (such as Germany) going with OOXML, and some (such as India) going against and announcing that fact, others voting against, and holding off on announcing their votes until September 2. I know of several countries in this category. When they are announced, I expect that the US is going to feel rather foolish, in comparison to its peer group if it decides to approve.
You may also recall from my prior post that I had said that I had had word that there was a sudden spate of countries suddenly, and at the last minute, deciding that they wanted to become "P" members of JTC1. At that time there were two new additions – now their are six. The recent arrivals are: Cyprus, Ecuador, Pakistan, Trinidad/Tobago, Uruguay, Venezuela. I would be willing to put money on whether they will vote for OOXML, and which way they will vote.
So there we are for this Friday afternoon. With many long-standing players voting against OOXML, but many hitherto-uninvolved countries sudenly deciding, at the last minute and before they can receive any input from informed sources, to become qualified to vote, we will just have to see how this vote turns out on September, after the vendors use "all tools at their (their?) disposal."
For further blog entries on here , click