Skip to primary content
ConsortiumInfo.org
Search
Sponsored by Gesmer Updegrove
  • Blog
  • About
  • Guide
  • SSO List
  • Meta Library
  • Journal
meta library

The Strategic Use Of Patents: Implications For Antitrust

Title
The Strategic Use Of Patents: Implications For Antitrust
Author
Daniel L. Rubinfeld, Professor of Law and Professor of Economics at the University of California, Berkeley, and Robert Maness, Senior Managing Economist, LECG, Inc.
Date
12/08/2008
(Original Publish Date: 9/18/2004)
Abstract
The intersection between IP and antitrust continues to be the subject of heated debate among academics and policymakers. The exercise of intellectual property rights has traditionally been viewed as a legitimate means to earn monopoly rents with respect to one or more products. Indeed, both U.S. competition agencies have made it clear that the protection of intellectual property is essential to provide firms and individuals with incentives to innovate. Thus, the IP guidelines explicitly recognize that intellectual property law and antitrust law share the common purpose of promoting innovation and enhancing consumer welfare
Link
Full Text (PDF)
Technical Areas
  • Antitrust (see also "Economics")
  • Antitrust (see also "Litigation and Legal Issues")
  • Economics
  • Government
  • Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
  • Legislation and Regulation
  • Litigation & Legal Issues
  • Participation
  • Participation (by Agencies)
  • Patents
  • Societal Benefits
  • Value Proposition
Gesmer Updegrove
  • Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Sitemap