Skip to primary content
ConsortiumInfo.org
Search
Sponsored by Gesmer Updegrove
  • Blog
  • About
  • Guide
  • SSO List
  • Meta Library
  • Newsletter
meta library

Patent Continuations, Patent Deception, and Standard Setting: The Rambus and Broadcom Decisions

Title
Patent Continuations, Patent Deception, and Standard Setting: The Rambus and Broadcom Decisions
Author
Herbert Hovenkamp, University of Iowa - College of Law
Date
10/14/2008
(Original Publish Date: 5/1/2008)
Abstract
This paper explores the implications of two recent Federal Circuit Court decisions involving patent holdup in the standard setting process. While the Rambus decision can be defended as a matter of antitrust policy, it exposes serious deficiencies in the patent continuation process that can legally permit anticompetitive holdup to occur. Broadcom, by contrast, is arguably not about antitrust policy at all, but rather the law of contract or equitable estoppel.
Link
Full Text
Technical Areas
  • Antitrust (see also "Economics")
  • Antitrust (see also "Litigation and Legal Issues")
  • Economics
  • Litigation & Legal Issues
Gesmer Updegrove
  • Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Sitemap