Find out more about this
Gesmer Updegrove has represented more than 184 standards consortia and open source foundations, including:
View Full Client List
Useful Links

Press Center Sitemap


Text Size:
Default  Large

RSS Feeds

Bookmark and Share

Standards <Meta>Library


Accredited SDOs

(Select a New Topic or Category)

Title: "Setting the Standard: A Fraud-based Approach to Antitrust Pleading in Standard Development Organization Cases"
Author: James Abell
Source: University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 4, 2008
Publication Date: October 24 2008
Free/Fee: Free Access
Reads: 5189
Abstract: This Comment addresses the question of whether claims brought under Section 2 of the Sherman Act based on allegations of deception of a Standards Development Organization (&quot;SDO&quot;) must meet the heightened pleading requirements of Rule 9(b). Despite the growing amount of litigation in this area, to date, no court has specifically addressed this matter. The Comment explores how courts have approached similar questions in other areas involving intellectual property law and antitrust law, such as Walker Process fraud claims. Ultimately, the Comment suggests a framework for evaluating these new claims and concludes that within the framework, SDO-based antitrust claims do meet the requirements for heightened pleading.
Link: Full Text