Home > Standards Blog

Advanced Search 

Welcome to ConsortiumInfo.org
Sunday, May 28 2017 @ 03:54 PM CDT

The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Rambus Redux: The FTC Tries One Last Time (and so do I)
Authored by: freddy on Friday, December 19 2008 @ 02:11 AM CST

1) Replace "knowledgeable" with "self-interested" and you would be more accurate (applies to both sides).

2) It was the DOJ that was involved in the DRAM price fixing case not the FTC as you have written in a least 2 posts - very sloppy and unprofessional for someone that makes many bold pronouncements about the facts of this case.

3) Are you going to quote ALJ McGuire where he "commented on Rambus's sleazy behavior"? Or was just another unsubstatiated claim that you like to make and then ignore when challenged - a clear case of cognitive dissonance.

4) You claim others are being selective but then cherry pick small pieces of dicta from the cases while ignoring the significant dicta from the CADC about the aggressive use of weak evidence by the FTC. You  even go so far to claim that the CADC accepted Rambus was deceptive when this clearly was not the case. There is a huge difference between "accepting" and "assuming" facts although you do have incentives to try and confuse this issue given your position.

[ Parent | # ]